With much fanfare the media have announced the first death in the U.S. alleged to be caused by swine flu. The victim is a 2-year old Mexican toddler who had traveled with his parents to Brownsville, TX.
Of course, to the parents this is an unspeakable tragedy. To us it means that the World Health Operators mean business (to be taken literally).
The little boy was taken to a hospital in Houston, where he was treated by doctors with one-track minds. He died in spite of this treatment... Or was it because of this treatment? What exactly did they do to this unfortunate little tyke? Give him toxic "antiviral" medication?
Real flu (which the boy may have had) is best left untreated. Virus diseases are cured by themselves. They don't kill people. Exceptions may be babies who don't have a fully developed immune system yet, and old people with severely compromised immune systems. Just stay in bed, drink plenty of fruit juices, and after 3 days you're again bright-eyed and bushy-tailed. I know. I've had the flu - in Mexico, some years ago.

If you get the flu, stay out of hospitals, for heaven's sake. The virologists, with blinders on, think that every disease is infectious and caused by a virus. This wrong thinking is encouraged (and generously rewarded) by a leering pharma industry that sees a great chance to pander its toxic wares.

This "swine flu virus", which nobody has ever seen on an electron microscope photo, is really clever, don't you think? It knew exactly that this boy was Mexican... Very impressive for something that is a lot smaller than a pea-brain. Other "swine flu victims" in the U.S. had been traveling to Mexico recently. What foods and/or medicines had they been using there? Has any possible cause been examined? Oh no! Right from the start an unlikely virus has been dictated to us as the cause of this sickness. It's like the "SMON epidemic" in Japan during the sixties and seventies. You can read all about that here:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15152488

This little boy is now dead because of the blockheaded attitude of the medical professionals, who want to push the virus theory at any price, while there is a good chance that this "swine flu" is entirely iatrogenic. Their previous hoax (bird flu) didn't work well, but this time they started their spiel right in the middle of the yearly flu season. A time when a lot of people get sick anyway... for about 3 days, if you don't start "treating" them.
And these diagnoses are mostly based on two simple lab tests. Are they specific for a swine flu virus unknown heretofore? How are we to know?
Sure, the geneticists, who also want a piece of the cake, are bringing on pieces of a genome they claim are typically viral. So what? Our body harbors many viruses. And for comparison with the RNA of the swine flu virus we are lacking just one thing: The swine flu virus.