With much fanfare the media have announced the first death in the U.S. alleged to be caused by swine flu. The victim is a 2-year old Mexican toddler who had traveled with his parents to Brownsville, TX.
Of course, to the parents this is an unspeakable tragedy. To us it means that the World Health Operators mean business (to be taken literally).
The little boy was taken to a hospital in Houston, where he was treated by doctors with one-track minds. He died in spite of this treatment... Or was it because of this treatment? What exactly did they do to this unfortunate little tyke? Give him toxic "antiviral" medication?
Real flu (which the boy may have had) is best left untreated. Virus diseases are cured by themselves. They don't kill people. Exceptions may be babies who don't have a fully developed immune system yet, and old people with severely compromised immune systems. Just stay in bed, drink plenty of fruit juices, and after 3 days you're again bright-eyed and bushy-tailed. I know. I've had the flu - in Mexico, some years ago.

If you get the flu, stay out of hospitals, for heaven's sake. The virologists, with blinders on, think that every disease is infectious and caused by a virus. This wrong thinking is encouraged (and generously rewarded) by a leering pharma industry that sees a great chance to pander its toxic wares.

This "swine flu virus", which nobody has ever seen on an electron microscope photo, is really clever, don't you think? It knew exactly that this boy was Mexican... Very impressive for something that is a lot smaller than a pea-brain. Other "swine flu victims" in the U.S. had been traveling to Mexico recently. What foods and/or medicines had they been using there? Has any possible cause been examined? Oh no! Right from the start an unlikely virus has been dictated to us as the cause of this sickness. It's like the "SMON epidemic" in Japan during the sixties and seventies. You can read all about that here:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15152488

This little boy is now dead because of the blockheaded attitude of the medical professionals, who want to push the virus theory at any price, while there is a good chance that this "swine flu" is entirely iatrogenic. Their previous hoax (bird flu) didn't work well, but this time they started their spiel right in the middle of the yearly flu season. A time when a lot of people get sick anyway... for about 3 days, if you don't start "treating" them.
And these diagnoses are mostly based on two simple lab tests. Are they specific for a swine flu virus unknown heretofore? How are we to know?
Sure, the geneticists, who also want a piece of the cake, are bringing on pieces of a genome they claim are typically viral. So what? Our body harbors many viruses. And for comparison with the RNA of the swine flu virus we are lacking just one thing: The swine flu virus.

Hog(wash) Flu

The CDC has found 8 cases of Swine Flu in the U.S. thus far. Should we be scared? Indeed we should be; scared to death... that the CDC will go on forever with this type of fear mongering. But to cheer us up, the CDC tells us that "the incidence of these infections has declined dramatically because of the advent of simpler, more potent, and less toxic antiretroviral (sic) drugs".
If this is not the most blatant attempt at lining the pockets of the pharma industry I've ever seen, I'll eat a whole swine - swine flu and all.
First of all, there are no real antiviral drugs. What is being foisted upon us is a collection of drugs that affect our metabolism, and in no way interact with any virus. These drugs are always toxic.

Note that antiretroviral drugs are being mentioned. This is a virological booboo of the first order. Flu viruses do not belong to the class of retroviruses, so I fail to see the relevance.
But OK, we're talking about swine flu, H1N1 to be exact. Has this virus really been detected in the 7 patients who became ill? In your dreams, CDC propagandists! The code H1N1 tells the whole story. H stands for hemaggglutination, a simple and quick blood test. N signifies the activity of the enzyme neuraminidase. So two simple tests, known as biological markers, are enough to represent a whole virus? I - don't - think - so! That could only be true if the virus has been isolated and purified, and shown to be the only entity to show these particular markers. Well... Has this swine flu virus been isolated and purified?? Haw! haw! haw!

The virologists have been presenting us with a lot of hogwash for the past 25 years. Remember that bird flu scare, 2 years ago? Now we're getting the same story warmed over, this time with pigs in the title role.
A swine flu virus does not infect humans. Only a cell that is infected at the same time with the pig virus and a human flu variant can produce virus particles that have exchanged part of their genetic material. This is not impossible, but highly improbable.
People get sick and die of a plethora of causes. To ascribe 8 cases of illness to a virus, without any solid evidence, is not science. Actually, it smells of money. The CDC is plugging two flu drugs, Tamiflu and Relenza. That's not surprising, because there are still large stockpiles of the stuff, held over from the bird flu pandemic that never was. And if you've got merchandise, you've got to sell. Whatever it takes...